validity and reliability of qualitative data

Lonny is qualified to walk you through your doctoral journey once you’ve decided to take the plunge! If interested, please complete the inquiry and/or contact form to let Dr. Lonny is a senior dissertation coach and chair with many years of experience at multiple online universities, as well as through personal consulting engagements, with over 80 graduated doctoral mentees. Click HERE for more information… ABOUT DR.

Ness has significant experience in successfully overseeing and guiding doctoral research candidates from topic selection to final dissertation oral defense, and all steps in-between. Lonny focuses on the dissertation fundamentals, to serve doctoral level candidates towards successful fulfillment of their terminal degree through individualized 1-on-1 dissertation coaching/mentoring. My Dissertation Coach offers doctoral students comprehensive dissertation coaching, consultation, expertise, and resources. Lonny today at along with a copy of your current dissertation (if applicable) for an initial assessment and quote. Need an expert review of your dissertation topic or interested in hiring a dissertation coach or editor? Contact Dr. Transferability - Results can be generalized to other settings.ĭependability - Opposed to the concept of reliability, research “describ the changes that occur in the setting and how these changes affected the way the research approached the study”Ĭonfirmability - Assumes that the researcher brings a unique perspective These are:Ĭredibility - Results are credible, or believable Consequently, it doesn’t make sense to be concerned with the “truth” or “falsity” of an observation with respect to an external reality (which is a primary concern of validity).Īlternatively, Guba and Lincoln offered four criteria for researchers to simulate the objectives of validity and reliability for qualitative research. They reject the basic realist assumption that their is a reality external to our perception of it. According to Trochim:ĭepending on their philosophical perspectives, some qualitative researchers reject the framework of validity that is commonly accepted in more quantitative research in the social sciences. In other words, the extent to which a research instrument consistently has the same results if it is used in the same situation on repeated occasions.įor qualitative, the argument is that validity and reliability do not necessarily apply to one’s perception of reality. Reliability the accuracy of an instrument. Validity is defined as the extent to which a concept is accurately measured in a quantitative study.

Validity and reliability of qualitative data